Enroll and authorize
A user-installed Node identifies the device and lets participants set CPU/GPU and scheduling limits.
The Eureka Compute Network is being planned as a network of computers running genuine, verifiable AI workloads with resource limits, safeguards and honest contribution metrics. There is no public Node release yet.
The intention is not to reward energy consumption or claimed computing power alone. We aim to account for useful AI development results under quality and verification standards.
A user-installed Node identifies the device and lets participants set CPU/GPU and scheduling limits.
A coordinator distributes approved, limited workloads compatible with the participant’s hardware.
Inference, benchmarking, curated preprocessing, evaluation and targeted training where technically feasible.
Results return to the network core and are tested before acceptance or use.
Approved work enters the contribution ledger and may qualify for rewards under future published rules.
Device status, tasks, verification, availability and measurable Eureka progress.
We envision configurable CPU/GPU, Node status, task history, accepted or rejected work and contribution metrics. Figures will only be displayed when backed by verified data.
Rewards should depend on verified work and an emission policy defined before launch. There is currently no guaranteed earning rate.
How rewards may workDistributed computing requires careful safeguards before public launch. Security must be part of the design, not an afterthought.
No arbitrary third-party code execution; controlled, signed and revocable workloads.
Private memory and personal data must not be sent to untrusted external devices.
Result verification, per-device limits and mechanisms against fake or reused work.
Configurable power and hardware use limits, allowing users to stop at any time.
Model and central memory updates go through evaluation; an external Node cannot decide what is true.
Work and verification records sufficient to explain credits and results without revealing user secrets.
We intend to let users choose resources and separate limits. Compatibility depends on the final release.
No. The proposal ties credits or future rewards to genuine accepted tasks under published rules.
There is no public release, confirmed launch date or final hardware requirements yet.
Not directly. The intended architecture keeps official models and memory under central validation.